French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Canine Hip Dysplasia Disease Syndrome in its severest form can be diagnosed by clinical signs, but it usually requires radiographic evidence of bulldog hip joint laxity & the appearance of bulldog degenerative joint disease to arrive at a definitive diagnosis. Clinical signs of French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Canine Hip Dysplasia Disease Syndrome are not by themselves Hip Dysplasia Pathognomonic Signs in French Bulldog & English Bulldogs, other conditions of the hip can mimic bulldog hip dysplasia. A radiograph is essential for a more accurate assessment of the French Bulldog & English Bulldog's hip joint integrity. Anyway affected French Bulldog & English Bulldogs may have one or any combination of the following clinical signs: French Bulldog & English Bulldogs the Presentation of Canine Hip Dysplasia Disease Syndrome occurs between 5 months to 12 months for the severe form of bulldog hip dysplasia; later for the chronic form. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs are showing Pain an Abnormal Gait & Bunny-hopping when Running. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs highlight Thigh Muscle Atrophy, loss of muscle mass. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs appear affected by Low Exercise Tolerance & Reluctance to Climb Stairs. Sometimes is Audible "click" When French Bulldog & English Bulldogs are Walking.
French Bulldog & English Bulldogs are particularly prone to Hip joint laxity. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Hip joint laxity is the most important risk factor for the development of Hip Dysplasia-HD & Osteoarthritis-OA. When the French Bulldog & English Bulldog hip joint becomes lax, the muscles over the joint compensate for the laxity by tensing. In French Bulldog & English Bulldogs the amount of laxity or looseness in a hip joint is related to the chance that a hip will develop HD or OA: the looser the hip, the greater the risk. Dysplasia comes from the Greek words dys, meaning disordered or abnormal, and plassein meaning to form. The expression Bulldog hip dysplasia can be interpreted as the abnormal or faulty development of the bulldog hip. Abnormal development of the bulldog hip causes excessive wear of the bulldog joint cartilage during weight bearing, eventually leading to the development of bulldog arthritis, often called bulldog degenerative joint disease-DJD or bulldog osteoarthritis-OA. The terms bulldog DJD, bulldog arthritis & bulldog osteoarthritis are used interchangeably. For this reason, it is important to understand, in French Bulldog & English Bulldogs, the difference between passive and functional hip laxity. Passive hip laxity is subjectively scored or measured on a hip radiograph of a dog while it is under heavy sedation or anesthesia. The PennHIP method measures passive laxity. Functional hip laxity is the pathologic form of laxity occurring during normal weightbearing in dogs with dysplastic hips. Current hip screening methods cannot assess functional hip laxity. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs hip dysplasia was first described in 1937 by Dr. Gerry B. Schnelle. In a paper entitled Bilateral Congenital Subluxation of the Coxofemoral Joints of a Dog Schnelle writes: The condition described herein, rare though it may be, should be recognized as being congenital and potentially hereditary, and the dog or bitch in which it occurs should be destroyed or sterilized in the eugenic interests of the breed. In 1966, Henricson, Norberg and Olsson refined the definition of Canine Hip Dysplasia Disease Syndrome describing it as: A varying degree of laxity of the hip joint permitting subluxation during early life, giving rise to varying degrees of shallow acetabulum and flattening of the femoral head, finally inevitably leading to osteoarthritis. Today, the general veterinary consensus is that bulldog hip dysplasia is bulldog hip joint laxity resulting in bulldog osteoarthritis. Clinically, in French Bulldog & English Bulldogs, the Effects of Functional Laxity on Joint Mechanics are prone to produce the hip injuries. Under normal conditions, the sum of the forces on the French Bulldog & English Bulldog joint are spread out over a large surface area. When laxity is present in the French Bulldog & English Bulldog joint, the force applied by the surrounding muscles actually increases to compensate for the laxity. The sum of the forces exerted on the French Bulldog & English Bulldogs dysplastic hip is greater than that the sum of the forces exerted on the French Bulldog & English Bulldogs normal hip. In addition, the forces on the French Bulldog & English Bulldogs dysplastic hip are applied over a smaller surface area. In French Bulldog & English Bulldogs the high joint contact stresses produce injury and ultimately result in the loss of delicate articular cartilage. Over time, functional hip laxity results in erosion of the French Bulldog & English Bulldog femoral head and flattening of the French Bulldog & English Bulldog acetabulum. French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Hip Dysplasia is characterized by a mutation of the bulldog hip joint that leads to bulldog joint laxity and consequential bulldog degenerative joint disease. The most widely used method for diagnosis of French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Hip Dysplasia is the ventrodorsal hip-extended radiologic view. The method of the University of Pennsylvania Hip Improvement Program, an alternative technique that is based on French Bulldog & English Bulldog hip joint laxity, provides a quantitative assessment, the distraction index (DI), of the likelihood of the development of French Bulldog & English Bulldogs Hip Dysplasia because of increased in the bulldog hip joint laxity.
Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6010, United States of America:
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate hip joint laxity in 10 breeds of dogs via 2 radiographic techniques. ANIMALS: 500 clinically normal dogs.
DESIGN:
Prospective study.
PROCEDURE:
Radiographs obtained via routine hip joint evaluations performed in sedated dogs of 10 popular breeds were randomly selected from a database. Measurements of distraction index (DI) and hip-extended index (HEI) on 1 hip joint radiograph randomly chosen from each dog were made.
RESULTS:
Mean age of dogs was 20.7 months. Mean HEI was 0.17 (range, 0.0 to 0.72) and mean DI was 0.44 (range, 0.07 to 0.96). Borzois had uniformly tight hip joints as judged by use of both methods and were considered the gold standard by which hip joint laxity was judged (all Borzois had DI < or = 0.32). Overall, DI was significantly greater than HEI. Within each breed, mean DI was always greater than mean HEI. Significant differences were detected among breeds for HEI; however, compared with DI, the magnitude of differences among breeds was less.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:
Distraction radiography detected the greatest range and magnitude of passive hip laxity in the 10 breeds of dogs. The difference in values between breeds known to have high prevalence of canine hip dysplasia and those in Borzois was greater for DI than for HEI. Breeds must be evaluated individually because of inherent differences in hip joint laxity.
Laboratory for Equine and Comparative Orthopedic Research, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States of America.
OBJECTIVE:
To assess relationships of acetabular volume (AV), femoral head volume (FV), and portion of the femoral head within in the acetabulum (FVIA) with each other and with degrees of hip joint laxity and degenerative joint disease from youth to maturity in dogs predisposed to developing hip joint osteoarthritis (OA).
ANIMALS:
46 mixed-breed half- or full-sibling hound-type dogs.
PROCEDURES:
The distraction index (DI), AV, FV, FVIA, and degree of osteoarthritis (OA score) were quantified in 1 hip joint at 16, 32, and 104 weeks of age. Relationships among variables were evaluated within and between ages. Ratios corresponding to OA scores were compared within ages. Differences among 16-week ratios corresponding to 32-week OA scores and among 16- and 32-week ratios corresponding to 104-week OA scores were evaluated.
RESULTS:
Significant positive relationships existed between FV and AV across ages as well as between FVIA/FV and FVIA/AV and between DI and OA score across and within most ages. Such relationships also existed within these variables across most ages. Negative relationships of DI and OA scores with FVIA/FV and FVIA/AV within and among all ages were significant. Sixteen-week AVs, FVs, and FVIAs were greater and FV/AVs and OA scores were less than 32- and 104-week values. The 32-week FVIA/FV was less than 16- and 104-week values, and the 32-week FVIA/AV was less than the 104-week value. The FVIA/FV and FVIA/AV were lower and the DI was higher with higher OA scores within and among most ages.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:
Structural volumes in lax canine hip joints changed predictably relative to each other during growth, despite degenerative changes. Measures developed in this study may augment current diagnosis and treatment strategies for hip dysplasia in dogs.